Drummond case
home / clarifications

Statement

Bribery of witnesses and false testimony against Drummond have not been proven

False

In response to a defamation lawsuit filed by Drummond in 2011 against Terrence Collingsworth and his law firm, Conrad & Scherer, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama declared that: “The court has no doubt that there is (at least) probable cause to believe that (attorney Terrence Collingsworth), while carrying out lawsuits on behalf of his firm, engaged in witness tampering and gave false testimony.”

Likewise, the Court declared that there was probable cause to believe that Collingsworth had committed fraud by concealing payments to witnesses against Drummond: “It is difficult to imagine a set of facts that could more clearly establish the first point of the case prima facie for breach of privilege. Collingsworth repeatedly made false representations in writings, depositions, correspondence, and in open court.”

© 2025 Drummond Company, Inc. y sus subsidiarias. Todos los derechos reservados.

Política de privacidad Términos y condiciones